Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD)
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD)
Diagnosis
On this page
Assess lipids and inherited risk
Lipid panel
Most patients can have a nonfasting lipid panel for routine screening and risk assessment. Obtain a fasting panel when the patient has:
- Nonfasting triglycerides ≥400 mg/dL
- A known or suspected triglyceride metabolism disorder
- A family history of dyslipidemia or premature ASCVD
Fasting improves triglyceride assessment and can help estimate LDL-C when nonfasting triglycerides are high. Evaluate secondary causes of abnormal lipids and consider familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) when LDL-C is markedly elevated.
Lp(a)
Measure Lp(a) at least once in adulthood, and note that it isn’t included in a standard lipid panel. Levels ≥125 nmol/L or ≥50 mg/dL indicate increased risk. These are separate unit-specific thresholds, not a fixed conversion. Use the result to refine risk discussions, address other risk factors, and guide family screening.
ApoB
Consider ApoB when triglycerides are elevated (particularly ≥150 mg/dL), diabetes is present, or achieved LDL-C is low (<70 mg/dL). It can identify residual atherogenic particle burden even after LDL-C and non–HDL-C goals are met.
Estimate risk before a first event
Use PREVENT-ASCVD for eligible adults aged 30–79 years without clinical ASCVD or subclinical atherosclerosis and with LDL-C of 70–189 mg/dL. In eligible adults aged 30–59 years, consider 30-year risk as well. Discuss risk enhancers that the calculator doesn’t capture.
Personalize risk assessment with risk enhancers
The PREVENT-ASCVD estimate informs the discussion but risk enhancers can help personalize it. Examples include family history of premature ASCVD, chronic inflammatory conditions, higher risk ancestry, and reproductive history, including early menopause, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and preterm delivery. These may influence treatment decisions, particularly when estimated risk is borderline or intermediate.
Use coronary testing when it can change care
Coronary artery calcium
Consider coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring in men aged ≥40 years and women aged ≥45 years when a primary prevention treatment decision remains uncertain, particularly at borderline or intermediate risk.
- A score of zero doesn’t exclude noncalcified plaque or override every other indication for treatment.
- CAC scoring isn’t a substitute for evaluating chest pain.
Symptoms suggesting coronary disease
New or worsening chest discomfort or other symptoms concerning for ACS require urgent assessment. For stable symptoms, select testing through a chest pain evaluation pathway based on clinical likelihood, prior disease, and patient characteristics.
Resources & References
Guidelines
Full guidelines, practical tools, and supporting publications are listed separately below.
- 2026 ACC/AHA Dyslipidemia Guideline
- 2023 AHA/ACC Chronic Coronary Disease Guideline
- 2025 ACC/AHA Acute Coronary Syndromes Guideline
- 2025 AHA/ACC High Blood Pressure Guideline
- ADA Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026: Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management
- 2021 AHA/ACC Chest Pain Guideline—Executive Summary
- 2019 ACC/AHA Primary Prevention Guideline—aspirin and lifestyle guidance
*For lipid management and risk estimation, use the 2026 dyslipidemia guideline rather than the older lipid recommendations in the 2019 prevention guideline.
Additional guidance & clinical tools
- 2026 Dyslipidemia Guideline-at-a-Glance—implementation summary
- 2026 ACC Antiplatelet Therapy Scientific Statement
- 2025 ESC/EAS Focused Update on Dyslipidaemias
- 2025 AACE Dyslipidemia Consensus Algorithm
- AHA PREVENT calculator
- Vasculearn Network Lp(a) Clinician Toolkit
- ACC Lipid Manager
- JACC Chest Pain Interactive Tool—evaluation and testing pathways
- 2022 ACC Acute Chest Pain Decision Pathway—emergency department evaluation and disposition
- ADA 2026 Pharmacologic Treatment Tables—agent-specific cardiovascular and kidney benefits
- AHA scientific statement on implementing prevention to eliminate health care inequities
References
1. Blumenthal RS, Morris PB, Gaudino M, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026;87(19):2624-2757. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.11.016
2. Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(9):833-955. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.003
3. Rao SV, O’Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;85(22):2135-2237. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.009
4. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(22):2218-2261. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.052
5. Mach F, Koskinas KC, Roeters van Lennep JE, et al. Eur Heart J. 2025;46(42):4359-4378. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf190
6. Patel SB, Belalcazar LM, Afreen S, et al. Endocr Pract. 2025;31(10):1207-1238. doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2025.07.014
7. Wiggins BS, Barac A, Benziger CP, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026;87(19):2617-2623. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.4872
8. Lee YJ, Lee SJ, Kim JW, et al. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(14):1365-1375. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2600283
9. Kumbhani DJ, Gibson CM, Kinlay S, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026;88(11):1284-1313. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2026.05.037
10. Jones DW, Ferdinand KC, Taler SJ, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;86(18):1567-1678. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.05.007
11. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(10):e177-e232. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.010
12. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2026;49(suppl 1):S216-S245. doi:10.2337/dc26-S010
13. Agarwala A, Patel J, Stephens J, et al. Circulation. 2023;148(15):1183-1193. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001171
There’s a place for
your voice here.
Patients and caregivers bring their questions and lived experiences. You bring a perspective that can make a difference. Meet the people behind the questions—and the peers who share your work.





